tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7347482.post-8084783843901733482008-04-10T16:37:00.000-07:002008-04-10T16:37:00.000-07:002008-04-10T16:37:00.000-07:00Okay, first your previous (funny and pointed) comments about the phony gentility and genuine pomposity of the Masters and its CBS lackeys have almost ruined the thing for me. Almost. Second, about "Tiger-proofing." The idea seems to be that because Tiger hits longer and more accurately than anyone with any given club that the course should be lengthened so that his distance advantage will be negated. But surely this only increases his advantage since he's the only one who can handle such a setup. Wouldn't Tiger-proofing really mean shortening the course, negating Tiger's advantage, and bringing more players into contention?Doc Bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06191184359899995112noreply@blogger.com